O prawie pisanym dla niestarannych : cywilistyczne konteksty ewolucji prawa pomocy społecznej

Ius civile vigilantibus scriptum est : księga jubileuszowa Profesora Adama Olejniczaka / redaktorzy naukowi: Jarosław Grykiel, Joanna Haberko, Krzysztof Mularski. Warszawa : Wydawnictwo C. H. Beck, 2022, s. 1-8.

Deinstytucjonalizacja w rozwiązywaniu problemów społecznych w środowisku lokalnym

Współczesne problemy resocjalizacji : w stronę integracji teorii z praktyką / pod redakcją naukową Wiesława Ambrozika i Marka Konopczyńskiego. Kraków : Impuls, 2022, s. 59-74.

O wzmocnienie ochrony życia dzieci nienarodzonych

Prawo do życia / redakcja naukowa Wojciech Lis. Warszawa : Wydawnictwo Instytutu Wymiaru Sprawiedliwości, 2022, s. 91-116.

Poland : Parental Authority

Content of the right to parental responsibility : Experiences – Analyses – Postulates / Paweł Sobczyk (ed.) – Miskolc, Budapest: Central European Academic Publishing, 2022., s. 147-185.

In proceedings before the court in family matters, it is necessary to move away from the adversarial approach (antagonizing parties or participants) to conciliatory solutions. This is important in cases of divorce, separation, and maintenance establishment. The legitimacy of deciding on alternate custody should be considered after a period of parental cooperation following a divorce judgment (minimum 6 months). During the divorce proceedings, the parties demonstrate a complete and permanent breakdown of their relationship, inter alia, in the spiritual (emotional) sphere, which is incompatible with proving that they form a parental upbringing community. The court hearing of a child should always take place in the presence of a psychologist. It should be mandatory to obtain a psychological opinion when deciding on alternate custody. There are grounds to support the proposal for the child to be protected in divorce proceedings (representative) as the parents involved in a dispute fail to recognize the needs of the child and do not adequately protect them. Parents who make it difficult for a child to contact their relatives - especially those who do not live with the child - threaten the good of the child. In such circumstances, the courts should consider limiting their parental authority (participation in therapy, supervision by a probation officer) and consider the possibility of the child living with the other parent. A foster family making it difficult or impossible for the parents and other persons close to the ward to have contact with the ward provides grounds for its dissolution. Training courses for family judges should include teaching cooperation with institutions that operate in the community to support families (local government, non-governmental, and associated with churches and religious associations). The guardianship court should have the authority to grant the status of an adult to a pregnant minor if - according to a psychological and educational evaluation - she is mature enough to exercise parental authority over the child after delivery.

The Primacy of Parents in Child-Rearing for a Child in Foster Care

Law, Identity and Values 2022, t. 2, nr 2, s. 7-24.

This study investigates the legal status of parents of children placed in foster care, in view of the constitutional principle of the primacy of parents in child-rearing. It analyzes the legal status of parents in all possible cases when a child has been placed in foster care or in a childcare facility, especially the case based on a ruling that restricts parental authority, which is the most common circumstance and the most ambiguous in terms of the research problem explored here. Moreover, this study examines the thesis that both parents and foster carers jointly affect the child, making it difficult to defend the position that parents should enjoy the primacy. Nevertheless, the purpose of the provisions of the Family and Guardianship Code and the Act on Family Support and Foster Care System is clearly to restore the primacy of parents.