Dr Grażyna Baranowska jest adiunktem w Poznańskim Centrum Praw Człowieka INP PAN. Uczestniczyła w licznych międzynarodowych i krajowych projektach badawczych i grantowych, między innymi jako Post-Doctoral Researcher w projekcie Memory Laws in European and Comparative Perspective (2016-2019), Fellow w Research Law: Constitutional Politics in Turkey II na Uniwersytecie Humboldta (2019), a także w projekcie Fostering Human Rights Among European (Internal and External) Policies (FRAME). W 2019-2020 pracowała ponadto w Niemieckim Instytucie Praw Człowieka w Berlinie, gdzie przygotowywała analizę na temat znaczenia Międzynarodowej Konwencji w sprawie ochrony wszystkich osób przed wymuszonym zaginięciem dla zaginionych migrantów i uchodźców. Obecnie kieruje trzyletnim projektem Osoby zaginione i wymuszone zaginięcia: obowiązki prawnomiędzynarodowe państw finansowanym przez NCN w ramach konkursu Sonata.
PUBLIKACJE:
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013

FORMA

Memory laws in Turkey : protecting the memory of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk

Criminalizing history : legal restrictions on statements and interpretations of the past in Germany, Poland, Rwanda, Turkey and Ukraine / ed. by Klaus Bachmann, Christian Garuka. Berlin: Peter Lang, 2020, s. 107-126.

Grażyna Baranowska’s research was conducted in the framework of her Post-Doctoral research project “Memory Laws in European and Comparative Perspective (MELA),” funded by HERA grant 15.904, and through a research fellowship at Research Lab: Constitutional Politics in Turkey II at Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.

Cytowania Cytowania

Historical Memory in Post-communist Europeand the Rule of Law : An Introduction

European Papers 2020, t. 5, nr 1, s. 95-106.

Współautorstwo: Castellanos-Jankiewicz, León

The legal governance of historical memory in Eastern and Central Europe has grown exponentially over the past two decades. This development runs parallel to the region’s reckoning with its communist legacies at the national level, where national identity has been harnessed and sometimes instrumentalised to adopt revisionist interpretations of the past. Mnemonic governance in these states has also been heavily influenced by their proximity or membership to the European Union, which upholds the rule of law as a fundamental value. At the same time, the region’s Soviet legacies have been projected by a newfound Russian assertiveness in the area, which has resulted in a phenomena known as memory wars. Those developments are accompanying the process of democratic transition in Eastern and Central European states are undergoing. This introductory Article sets out the premises of the Special Section on historical memory in post-Communist Europe and the rule of law, by showing that the democratization processes are far from linear.

Cytowania Cytowania

Analysis Disappeared Migrants and Refugees : The Relevance of the International Convention on Enforced Disappearance in their search and protection

Berlin : German Institute for Human Rights, 2020

ISBN 9783946499763

40 stron. Bibliografia na stronach 33-40.

Deaths and disappearances on various migration routes are widely reported and yet there remains little information on the legal obligations of States in these cases. This analysis highlights State obligations with regard to disappeared migrants and refugees, as arising from the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (ICPPED). It also points to issues that would benefit from additional interpretation by the Committee monitoring the implementation of the ICPPED. While most migrants and refugees do not disappear by way of enforced disappearance, this study examines the criteria for classifying an enforced disappearance as set out in Article 2 of the ICPPED. The Convention defines enforced disappearance as the deprivation of liberty with the authorization, support, or acquiescence of a State, followed by a refusal to acknowledge the deprivation of liberty or concealment of the fate or whereabouts of this person.In migration contexts, States at times cooperate in committing enforced disappearances or commit them in the territory of another State. The analysis proposes ways to assess State responsibility in such circumstances. The ICPPED furthermore obliges States to cooperate in investigating enforced disappearances, assist victims, and search for disappeared persons. These obligations require the undertaking of specific measures by States such as establishing competent authorities, developing cooperation agreements, and adopting specific instruments to ensure the effective participation of families from abroad. A crucial factor in the context of migration is the realization of the obligation to ensure everyone the right to report alleged enforced disappearances to competent authorities, given that this may need to occur from abroad. When there are reasonable grounds to believe that an enforced disappearance has occurred, States are under obligation to undertake an ex officio investigation. This is also the case where an enforced disappearance has been committed by another State.This study shows that the compliance with ICPPED obligations can help to prevent migrants and refugees from disappearing, and may greatly aid the search for them. One crucial mechanism to achieve this, is the cooperation between States in the measures enshrined in the Convention which are particularly relevant in the migration context

Cytowania Cytowania

The Puzzle of Punitive Memory Laws : New Insights into the Origins and Scope of Punitive Memory Laws

East European Politics and Societies 2020, t. 20, nr 10, s. 1-17.

Współautorstwo: Bachmann, Klaus; Lyubashenko, Igor; Garuka, Christian; Pavlaković, Vjeran

In recent years and decades, authoritarian regimes and illiberal democracies have passed and enforced punitive memory laws, intending to ban certain interpretations of past events or sheltering official versions of history against challenges. This comes with no surprise in countries whose governments undermine pluralism and assume the existence of a historical truth that is stable over time, invariable, and self-explanatory. But why do liberal democracies, committed to political pluralism and open debate, pass laws that penalize challenges to certain interpretations of the past and restrict freedom of speech? This article argues that liberal democracies may do so yielding to bottom–up pressure by courts and to regulate civil law disputes for which existing legislation and jurisprudence may not suffice. Based on case studies from Germany, France, Switzerland, Poland, Ukraine, Russia, Turkey, Rwanda, and the former Yugoslavia, we also found punitive memory laws in liberal democracies narrower and more precise than in nonliberal states.

Cytowania Cytowania

Penalizing Statements about the Past in Turkey

Responsibility for negation of international crimes / edited by Patrycja Grzebyk ; translated by Mateusz Matuszczak. Warszawa : Wydawnictwo Instytutu Wymiaru Sprawiedliwości, 2020, s. 249-258.

Cytowania Cytowania

Penalizacja wypowiedzi o przeszłości w Turcji

Odpowiedzialność za negowanie zbrodni międzynarodowych / pod redakcją Patrycji Grzebyk. Warszawa : Wydawnictwo Instytutu Wymiaru Sprawiedliwości, 2020, s. 243-251.


Instytut Nauk Prawnych Polskiej Akademii Nauk
ul. Nowy Świat 72 (Pałac Staszica),
00-330 Warszawa
Created and Powered by Ryszard Dróżdż, 2024 ©