Kilka uwag o kryminalizacji zachowań korupcyjnych

Granice kryminalizacji i penalizacji. Red. Stanisław Pikulski, Marta Romańczuk-Grącka. Olsztyn 2013 "ElSet" ss. 706, s. 351-358

Wpływ procesów globalizacyjnych na polskie prawo karne

Współautorstwo: Sakowicz, Andrzej

Warszawa : LEX a Wolters Kluwer business, 2014

Seria: Monografie LEX,

ISBN 9788326434877

420 stron. Bibliografia na stronach 385-420.

Publikacja finansowana ze środków Ministerstwa Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego na naukę

Przeszczepy prawne jako instrument hybrydyzacji prawa

Studia Prawnicze 2014, nr 3, s. 5-27.

The notion and theories on legal transplants and – more broadly – legal transplantation have been an object of interest in comparative law in the world since the 70s., especially in the framework of research on mixed legal systems. The theories of legal transplants remain rather unknown to the Polish researchers. And yet they may constitute a useful tool of analysis of contemporary transformations of legal systems, stemming from globalization. The article is aimed at acquainting Polish readers with theories on mixed legal systems and legal transplants and explaining briefly in what way legal transplants contribute to the hybridization of legal systems in the world.

Judicial Control of the Prosecutors’ Activities in the Light of the ECHR

eucrim. The European Criminal Law Association' Forum 2014, nr 2, s. 60-63.

This article is a revised English version of a paper presented by the author at the conference “Le contrôle judiciaire du Parquet européen. Nécessité, modèles, enjeux,” which took place in Paris on 9–10 April 2014.

The judicial control of the activities of prosecutors within criminal proceedings constitutes an important issue in every legal system. It is particularly important at the pre-trail stage of proceedings, when the prosecutor is responsible for many actions, and of lesser importance at the judicial stage of the proceedings, when the court takes over. However, the issue of judicial control of prosecutors’ actions may warrant special attention once the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (hereinafter the “EPPO”) is established. When it comes to prosecutorial actions, the EPPO will be subjected to the control of the national courts. Therefore, it will be necessary to define the framework of the judicial control of the EPPO’s activities executed by national courts. It seems obvious that in every legal system, with its specificities and traditions, the legal framework regarding the judicial control of prosecutors’ actions within criminal proceedings may vary. For this reason, it becomes necessary to search for a common ground, rules that might be useful and applicable in every legal system. In Europe, it may be enlightening to examine the standards related to the judicial control of prosecutorial activities set forth by the European Court of Human Rights. It will be particularly informative to find answers to the following three questions that will be considered in this article – who controls prosecutors, what is controlled, and what should be the control.

Odpowiedzialność podmiotów zbiorowych : praktyka stosowania przepisów

Rola urzędów administracji państwowej w identyfikowaniu nieprawidłowości w zamówieniach publicznych : IV Międzynarodowa Konferencja Antykorupcyjna : materiały pokonferencyjne / Centralne Biuro Antykorupcyjne. Warszawa : Legionowo : Centrum Szkolenia Policji. Wydział Wydawnictw i Poligrafii, 2014, s. 36-47.

Liability of Collective Entities : Practice of Applying Regulations

Rola urzędów administracji państwowej w identyfikowaniu nieprawidłowości w zamówieniach publicznych : IV Międzynarodowa Konferencja Antykorupcyjna : materiały pokonferencyjne / Centralne Biuro Antykorupcyjne. Warszawa : Legionowo : Centrum Szkolenia Policji. Wydział Wydawnictw i Poligrafii, 2014, s. 99-110.

Actualités du droit pénal polonais 2013-2014

Revue de science criminelle et de droit pénal comparé 2014, nr 2, s. 453-458.

Współautorstwo: Kosonoga, Jacek

Le contrôle judiciaire du parquet au regard de la CEDH

Le contrôle judiciaire du parquet – Nécessité, Modèles, Enjeux / de Genevieve (dir) Giudicelli-delage, Stefano (dir) Manacorda (Auteur), Juliette Tricot (red.). - Unité mixte de recherche de droit comparé de Paris, t. 37 - Paris: Société de Législation Comparée, 2014, s. 87-95.

Judical Control of the Prosecutors’ Activities in the Light of the ECHR

Eucrim. The European Criminal Law Association' Forum 2014, nr 3, s. 60-63.

The judicial control of the activities of prosecutors within criminal proceedings constitutes an important issue in every legal system. It is particularly important at the pre-trail stage of proceedings, when the prosecutor is responsible for many actions, and of lesser importance at the judicial stage of the proceedings, when the court takes over. However, the issue of judicial control of prosecutors’ actions may warrant special attention once the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (hereinafter the “EPPO”) is established. When it comes to prosecutorial actions, the EPPO will be subjected to the control of the national courts. Therefore, it will be necessary to define the framework of the judicial control of the EPPO’s activities executed by national courts. It seems obvious that in every legal system, with its specificities and traditions, the legal framework regarding the judicial control of prosecutors’ actions within criminal proceedings may vary. For this reason, it becomes necessary to search for a common ground, rules that might be useful and applicable in every legal system. In , it may be enlightening to examine the standards related to the judicial control of prosecutorial activities set forth by the European Court of Human Rights. It will be particularly informative to find answers to the following three questions that will be considered in this article – who controls prosecutors, what is controlled, and what should be the control.